top of page

Is AI Making Us Dumb? Or Are We Using It Wrong?

  • Writer: Sankalp Pathak
    Sankalp Pathak
  • Jul 29
  • 4 min read

Yesterday, I watched two designers work on the same branding brief. The first opened ChatGPT immediately. "Give me 20 logo ideas for a premium coffee brand." Within minutes, they had pages of polished concepts.


The second designer did something different. They spent twenty minutes understanding the brand first. Who buys this coffee? Why should they care? What feeling should the brand leave behind? Only after answering those questions did they open AI.


The difference wasn't in the quality of the prompts.It was in the quality of the thinking that happened before the prompt. That's when I realized something. AI isn't making us less creative. It's exposing how much thinking we're willing to do.

AI Doesn't Reward Creativity. It Rewards Clarity.

Most people believe better prompts create better results.


I don't. Better thinking creates better prompts.


Ask AI: "Design a luxury perfume."You'll get something that looks... luxurious.Now try this instead: "Design a luxury perfume inspired by forgotten libraries in Kyoto. The audience is architects who value silence over status. Avoid gold, black, and every luxury cliché."


Suddenly, AI starts producing ideas that feel more distinctive. Not because AI became smarter.Because you gave it something worth thinking about. AI isn't a creator. It's a mirror. It reflects the depth of the person using it.

Stop Asking AI to Create. Start Asking It to Think.

One of the biggest mistakes we make is treating AI like a vending machine. We type a request.


We collect the output. We move on. The best creatives I've worked with use AI very differently.They don't ask for answers. They ask for friction. Instead of: "Write this article."


They ask:

  • Where does my argument feel weak?

  • What assumptions am I making?

  • What would someone who disagrees with me say?

  • Which parts sound predictable?

  • What examples would make this more memorable?


AI becomes an editor instead of a ghostwriter. And that's where the real value begins.

Make AI Work Harder Than You

Most people use AI like a search engine. Professionals use it like a team. Imagine you're designing a new packaging concept.


Instead of asking: "Design premium packaging."


Try this: "You're a panel of five creative directors. One loves minimalism. One is obsessed with sustainability. One thinks like a retailer. One is a first-time customer. One is brutally honest. Debate this packaging concept and tell me where it fails."


Now AI isn't generating. It's challenging. That's a completely different conversation.

Originality Doesn't Come From AI. It Comes From Iteration.

There's a fear that AI will make everyone's work look the same. That only happens when everyone starts from the same place. If your first step is opening AI, chances are you'll end up somewhere familiar. But if your first step is observation, curiosity, sketching, researching, or simply thinking, AI becomes a tool that expands your ideas instead of replacing them.


My favourite workflow is surprisingly simple:

  1. Think first.

  2. Create a rough idea.

  3. Ask AI to critique it.

  4. Improve it.

  5. Challenge it again.


The first idea stays yours. AI simply helps you make it stronger.

Every Creative Discipline Can Use AI Differently

  • A writer shouldn't ask AI to write the article. They should ask where the story loses momentum.

  • A researcher shouldn't ask for a summary. They should ask what's missing, what's biased, and what evidence contradicts the conclusion.

  • A brand strategist shouldn't ask for campaign ideas. They should ask AI to predict why the campaign might fail before it launches.

  • A packaging designer shouldn't ask for a premium box. They should ask how that box would look if it were designed by Muji, Apple, Hermès, or IKEA and then study the principles behind each approach instead of copying the aesthetics.

  • A social media designer shouldn't ask for an Instagram post. They should ask what emotion would make someone stop scrolling in under a second.


Notice the pattern? The best questions aren't about creating. They're about understanding.

The Best Prompt Is Rarely the First Prompt

We spend hours refining a design. We edit articles multiple times. We test different strategies before launching campaigns. So why do we expect the first AI prompt to be perfect? The best AI conversations are iterative.

Ask.

Challenge.

Refine.

Repeat.


Treat AI like a creative partner, not a one-time answer generator.

A Simple Habit That Changes Everything

The next time you're about to open ChatGPT, pause for ten minutes.


Write your own thoughts first. Sketch the first idea. List five possibilities. Ask yourself what makes the problem interesting. Then open AI and ask one simple question: "What am I missing?"

You'll notice something surprising. The answers become better. Not because AI changed. Because you did.

Final Thought

The future won't belong to the people who know the cleverest prompts. It will belong to the people who bring curiosity, taste, context, and judgment to every conversation with AI. AI can generate a thousand ideas in seconds. But it still can't decide which idea is worth pursuing.


That's still our job. And maybe that's the real opportunity. Instead of asking whether AI is making us dumb, we should ask a better question: How can we make AI think harder without asking it to think for us?

If you've made it this far, here's one last thought.


Yes, this article was written with AI.


Not because AI had something to say.


But because I did.

Before the first prompt, there was an idea, a point of view I wanted to explore, questions

I wanted to challenge, and conversations I wanted to start. I brought the questions, opinions, examples, rewrites, and the point of view I wanted to explore.


AI didn't create that.


It helped me shape it into words.


That's the future I'm optimistic about—not humans competing with AI, but humans bringing the thinking, and AI helping us communicate it better.


The thought came first. AI came second.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page